Thursday, March 28, 2024

Assess Gender-Based Differences In Toy Advertising: Princess Vs. Superhero


 From: Indigo 

Playing with toys are a large part of one’s childhood. From dolls to building blocks, children play till their imaginations dwindle, and the days end. Yet, these toys are seemingly divided against one another, through advertisement and packaging. Toys have become gendered, with boys seen building and destroying whilst girls dwell on their appearances and on their fake maternal instincts. Toy advertisement, and toys in general, are gendered in such a way that children are divided and harmed in the process.

Using my photo, I conveyed the difference between the two aspects of gendered childhood via toy advertisement. When walking through the toy aisles of the store, I walked into the “boys” aisles first. They were flooded with superhero and building toys. The aisles are colored dark blues and black. Meanwhile, a few aisles over is the “girl” toy department looked remarkable different. There are aisles of princess’ and baby dolls flood the space. The two photos shown compare the aspects of childhood. Both show dolls, yet they’re portrayed differently. One section of dolls are seen as more masculine “heroes”, while the other aisle is speaking of princess’ and more feminine dolls. The two are both playing with dolls, yet on opposite ends of the spectrum, on two sides of the photo.

Toys used to be ungendered, and instead were just played by whomever and produced with no intended gender. Until the 1940s, when toys took a turn. Toys became gendered in order for companies to make copious amounts of money from more wealthier families. The companies at hand thought that if they advertised their toys, and toy sets, to wealthy parents, they’d end up buying them all for their children (Maas). These companies depended on families buying into the binary and forcing their children to conform their playtime to it. Toy companies paid to advertise to these families, knowing their pockets would be filled from parents forcing their children to conform.

Companies conform to binary centric ideas through their products, and the packaging surrounding them. LEGO is a brand that notoriously submitted to this conundrum, especially when it came to young girls. For decades, LEGO was advertised and sold to young boys, who could build and destroy their creations. Then in 2013, they established sets of pink LEGOs intended for girls. They made them domesticated, and made it seem that girls should just be baking and hanging with one another (Abadi). They faced backlash, from this, since they were perpetuating harmful stereotypes around girls and girlhood. This showed how harmful the advertisement was deeply rooted in their company, since they couldn’t even create an adequate toy for girls, or just simply stop gendering their previous products. Companies have no clue how to advertise their products without some sort of binary in place.

Toy companies have perpetuated the binary using advertisements since the 1940s. they force boys and girls into it, by making boys builders and girls beauty obsessed and domestic. These companies have harmed children with their copious amount of ads, to the point that I, a consumer, can walk into a store and realize the vast difference between the select aisles. They keep children apart, rather than let them create stories of their own, and live without these stereotypes surrounding them.

 

Works Cited

Abadi, Ponta. “Kids Toys: More Gendered Than Ever.”  Ms. Magazine, 05 June 2013. https://msmagazine.com/2013/06/05/kids-toys-more-gendered-than-ever/    

Maas, Megan. How toys became gendered – and why it’ll take more than a gender-neutral doll to change how boys perceive femininity.” The Conversation, 05 December 2019. https://theconversation.com/how-toys-became-gendered-and-why-itll-take-more-than-a-gender-neutral-doll-to-change-how-boys-perceive-femininity-124386.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This photo not only conveys the stark contract in coloring between toys geared towards girls and boys but also shows the difference in which toys seem to be more “desirable.” In the Smurfette Principle, we analyze how often times in the media female characters are background characters in comparison to the often-male protagonist. I don't know about all children, but most who I have watched over the past decade have almost always named the protagonist character as their favorite and when asked why, they often say it's because they are the “strong” one.

This photo shows how the “strong” male characters are advertised more towards children due to how they are represented in the media. Why be a princess when you could be a crime-fighting superhero? Even though the advertisers tried to lean towards children’s interest with the “Dream Big Princess” sign, it clearly is not as effective at moving product.

Then there is the lighting of the photo. The princess sign blocks out all light making the toys appear darker and the detail is lost in the shadows. The superhero toys have an open top to the display which lets the light shine down on them like a spotlight. Now you tell me which would catch your eye more, a dark shadowy display, or a bright one?

Excellent work!

-NM

Anonymous said...

These images are extremely powerful because it shows the way society has pushed gender roles on children that have no choice of picking what they want. The difference between the aisles speaks louder than words. Of course the girls section has barbies, dresses, makeup and or beauty stuff. The prescribed role of being this beautiful woman that can be either a mother or a nurse. The barbies show these little girls that they need to follow the role of women. Along with the boys isle they are taught that they can be adventurous and this cool strong man. They can’t think outside of the picture like being a teacher or a nurse or a cashier. These sections are restricting children from growing up and believing that they can truly be anything they want. As we learned in class, little girls are taught to be nurturing mothers meanwhile boys play in sports or a handyman. It’s upsetting to know that it draws them to think less of themselves but unless something is done nothing will change.

Great job on the project !!