From: Coral
The idea behind this
picture comes from the terror management theory and self-objectification. The
terror management theory, as Laurie A. Rudman and Peter Glick state in The Social Psychology of Gender, is
based on the idea that “people need to distance themselves from the human body
to allay fears associated with mortality” (241.) In other words, anything that
reminds us of our own mortality- in this photo I focus on creaturehood- makes
us feel uneasy and even fearful. Women, being more obvious reminders of
mortality by way of the very bodily and mammalian processes of menstruation,
lactation, and birth, are asked to remove every trace of creaturehood wherever
possible. In the case of this photograph, the removal of leg hair separates us
from animals and therefore eventual death (as all animals die.) The use of
nature colors- the green of the bathroom decorations and the loofa, the earthy
floral pattern of the dress, and even the warmth of the photo’s tone- signify
that it’s considered alright and even encouraged for women to identify with nature
with its delicacy and maternalism, as long as it’s external and not part of the
body.
The dress ties more into
self-objectification. The self-objectification theory suggests that, “women
internalize cultural messages that their bodies are objects to be consumed by
men; as a result, their bodies become objects in their own minds” (Rudman,
Glick 243) The exaggeratedly domestic 50’s style, gentle pattern, and
accentuation of the breasts highlight the role of a woman to express her
femininity by following a strict beauty standard. Even while performing a
somewhat private, ugly task, the expectation to be presentable to a male
audience weighs on the subject. The subject is wearing a wedding ring, saying
she’s essentially found the love society has told her is all-important to her
success and identity, but the standard remains, and she must be as un-animal as
possible to deserve love or existence.
The visual emphasis of
the photo, however, is the not insignificantly sized drop of blood running down
the freshly hairless strip of skin on the subject’s leg. This speaks to the
fact that, not only are women willing to conform to an inconvenient beauty
standard like the dress, but we are willing to risk literally harming ourselves
to meet that standard. Women starve themselves, undergo surgery, wear
constricting clothing, spend thousands of dollars a year and countless hours
covering imperfections with makeup, styling hair, removing hair, and following
fashion trends, all to conform to an ideal image of what makes a beautiful,
love-deserving woman. Although the subject’s face is slightly hidden because
her unique identity matters so little, what we can see of her expression is
calm as she looks at the blood she’s just drawn. What is an injury compared to
beauty?
1 comment:
From: Jessica
Back in middle school (around 6th grade), I constantly saw young girls of 11 and 12 coming in with legs marked by shaving razors. I was very shocked by this and it was what led me to have a slight aversion to razors ever since. The thought that our culture had convinced these girls at the tender age of 11/12 to start shaving their leg hair so that they would look presentable to men was unbelievable. I feel that your photo touches on this sentiment and helps us to see the true horror behind trying to keep our body parts looking socially acceptable. What I found most stunning about this photo was that it was shot looking down on the woman. It gives the impression that as a society, we look down upon this woman for going to such lengths to look beautiful in society’s eyes and yet, any other time- in any other place- we look up to her. She would be seen as a beautiful woman and would be considered well-kept and “clean”. Your picture perfectly exemplifies this paradox by deciding to shoot at that angle.
Post a Comment